Must do better.
A culture war skirmish between BBC Executives and the Commons Public Accounts Committee broke out yesterday afternoon, over something the BBC calls Atuk, and lower mortals call Across The UK. Loose business speak was the spark point. When "Across The UK" was first announced in March 2021 it was called both a 'strategy' and 'a programme'.
For the NAO and the Treasury, 'a programme' is a plan, signed off at the highest level, which must have a series of clear measurable benefits, with baselines, and specific spend and time targets against the improvements required. Sadly for former marketing man, Tim, the first document was more of 'a strategy' than a plan. The formal BBC Business Case was not signed off by the Board until October 2021.
We don't have sight of that Business Case, but the March document very much follows Tim's assumptions of what he believed blindingly obvious; spending more outside London would develop more consistent 'love' for the BBC, and deliver programming to delight audiences that currently felt left out of its benevolent munificence.
"We will show audiences across the UK that we are relevant to their lives because the stories we tell will be rooted in, and inspired by, their communities. Our ‘Across the UK’ plan will transform the BBC by making a decisive shift in its footprint. Over the next six years we will recreate the BBC as a genuinely UK-wide organisation with a much stronger presence across the length and breadth of the country. This shift will move the creative and journalistic centre of the BBC away from London to a much more distributed model that moves not just people, but power and decision-making to the UK’s Nations and regions."
No comments:
Post a Comment