Matt Brittin has followed traditional BBC routes to savings. Which are not strategic. So that's a bit disappointing.
Think of broadcast channels as taps, which provide a fairly continuous service everytime you turn them on; you recognise what comes out, and you leave it on if you like it. It's true of radio and tv, both of which will continue to live alongside 'content' (programmes by any other name) delivered by the internet.
If you're moving from taps to provide 'content', to making little plastic bottles of 'content', to be chosen from the shelves of iPlayer, Sounds and Other People's Platforms, then you need to make two decisions: which content survives in the little bottles, and which taps should be turned off. Turning taps off half-cock at source satisfies no-one.
Sadly, Mr Brittin has started off by making tap delivery of Radio 4 and BBC1 as intermittent as the provision of H20 by South East Water.
Radio 4, a channel that people go to bed with, and wake up to, will have a current affairs programme at 10pm which will refer to "The British Prime Minister". It will have no major dedicated bulletin at midnight, til 6am. It's a move which won't help Today audience figures. It's a big stutter in the Radio 4 service flow and a kick in the teeth for a World Tonight team which thought it was just fighting a nasty new rota pattern. (I will return to the logic for the decision offered by Jonathan Munro...)
On BBC1, Breakfast on Sunday disappears, to be replaced by programming from a News Channel which will have even "more of an international focus... building on the growth in viewers outside the UK". The perfect answer to the rise of GB News, eh ?
Elsewhere, BBC Local will lose 90 jobs "with more to come", and the Nations will lose 250. All coming ahead of the appointment of new Director of News, ahead of the big strategic decision on which taps to turn off, and all apparently more important to Matt than cutting 700 jobs in "Corporate". Is that, by the way, another 10% cut ? Is "Corporate" 7,000 strong ?